Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jesper Sorensen, Victoria Chang. The Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) (referred as “Xerox Acs” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Leadership, Mergers & acquisitions, Strategic planning, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) Case Study

In February 2010, Ursula Burns CEO of Norwalk, Connecticut-based Xerox Corporation wrapped up her first big move, just seven months after ascending to the top spot. Xerox-a document technology, software, services, and supplies company, had acquired Dallas-based Affiliated Computer Services (ACS), a major global player in business process outsourcing (BPO) and information technology services. The acquisition represented a bold move by Xerox into business process outsourcing, and the latest attempt to transform Xerox from a manufacturer of office equipment into a provider of business services. Burns argued that if she and her team could successfully combine Xerox and ACS, the company could achieve $100 million in synergies in the first year alone, with significant future growth prospects. External watchers and analysts, however, would be difficult to convince, though, as many argued that Xerox faced an uphill battle. This case explores Xerox's rationale for acquiring ACS and how Burns planned to achieve her vision of growth and expansion for a company well known for, but somewhat confined by its research and technology capabilities.

Case Authors : Jesper Sorensen, Victoria Chang

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Leadership, Mergers & acquisitions, Strategic planning, Technology

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001891)	-10001891	-	-
Year 1	3464963	-6536928	3464963	0.9434	3268833
Year 2	3968073	-2568855	7433036	0.89	3531571
Year 3	3965454	1396599	11398490	0.8396	3329472
Year 4	3247369	4643968	14645859	0.7921	2572220
TOTAL			14645859		12702096

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2700205

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Xerox Acs have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Xerox Acs shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Xerox Acs often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Xerox Acs needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001891)	-10001891	-	-
Year 1	3464963	-6536928	3464963	0.8696	3013011
Year 2	3968073	-2568855	7433036	0.7561	3000433
Year 3	3965454	1396599	11398490	0.6575	2607350
Year 4	3247369	4643968	14645859	0.5718	1856694
TOTAL					10477489

The Net NPV after 4 years is 475598

(10477489 - 10001891 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001891)	-10001891	-	-
Year 1	3464963	-6536928	3464963	0.8333	2887469
Year 2	3968073	-2568855	7433036	0.6944	2755606
Year 3	3965454	1396599	11398490	0.5787	2294823
Year 4	3247369	4643968	14645859	0.4823	1566054
TOTAL					9503952

The Net NPV after 4 years is -497939

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9503952 - 10001891 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Xerox Acs to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Xerox Acs has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Xerox Acs can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Xerox Acs, then the stock price of the Xerox Acs should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Xerox Acs should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS)

References & Further Readings

Jesper Sorensen, Victoria Chang (2018), "Xerox and Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.