×




BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Yuan Ding, Hua Zhang, Chun Xie. The BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management (referred as “Byd's Byd” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IPO, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management Case Study


BYD Company Limited (BYD) manufactured rechargeable batteries, mobile phone components, and automobiles. In 2008, the company caught the attention of Warren Buffet's investment group, and their investment in BYD caused BYD's share price to increase 917.86 per cent over just a year, setting Chinese investors' expectations high for BYD's release of A-shares, planned for June 2011. BYD's 2010 annual report showed that the company's performance had already taken a dip, but its prospectus was optimistic about the market prospects. The first quarter report for 2011, issued the day before the A-shares were to be released, was not as optimistic. BYD's A-shares fared well on the first day of release, but the company's net profits declined remarkably, and reports forecasted further decline. However, the company's 2011 annual report showed a drop in operating profits of just 49.04 per cent year over year-just slightly less than the 50 per cent decline that would have triggered intervention by the securities regulators. Was the company making a remarkable recovery? Were BYD's A-shares still a sound investment, or had the company "managed" its financial statements to protect itself and its securities underwriters? Yuan Ding, Hua Zhang and Chun (Jane) Xie are affiliated with China Europe International Business School.


Case Authors : Yuan Ding, Hua Zhang, Chun Xie

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : IPO, Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015331) -10015331 - -
Year 1 3467472 -6547859 3467472 0.9434 3271200
Year 2 3955523 -2592336 7422995 0.89 3520401
Year 3 3942688 1350352 11365683 0.8396 3310357
Year 4 3240899 4591251 14606582 0.7921 2567096
TOTAL 14606582 12669054




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2653723

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Byd's Byd have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Byd's Byd shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Byd's Byd often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Byd's Byd needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015331) -10015331 - -
Year 1 3467472 -6547859 3467472 0.8696 3015193
Year 2 3955523 -2592336 7422995 0.7561 2990944
Year 3 3942688 1350352 11365683 0.6575 2592381
Year 4 3240899 4591251 14606582 0.5718 1852995
TOTAL 10451513


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436182

(10451513 - 10015331 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015331) -10015331 - -
Year 1 3467472 -6547859 3467472 0.8333 2889560
Year 2 3955523 -2592336 7422995 0.6944 2746891
Year 3 3942688 1350352 11365683 0.5787 2281648
Year 4 3240899 4591251 14606582 0.4823 1562934
TOTAL 9481033


The Net NPV after 4 years is -534298

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481033 - 10015331 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Byd's Byd to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Byd's Byd has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Byd's Byd can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Byd's Byd, then the stock price of the Byd's Byd should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Byd's Byd should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management

References & Further Readings

Yuan Ding, Hua Zhang, Chun Xie (2018), "BYD: The Art of Precise Profit Management Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Arctic Glacier Income Fund SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Invesque SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


K W Nelson Interior SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kaneshita Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Krebs Biochemicals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Anglo American SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Sinetech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Ep Energy C SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Keyrus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


BioLife Solutions SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs