×




Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ali Farhoomand, Peta Ashworth. The Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System (referred as “Bal Bal's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System Case Study


Formed in late 1996, Boeing Australia Ltd. (BAL) was a relatively new company and a global extension of the U.S. firm, the Boeing Co. BAL developed capabilities in the areas of space and communications, site management, and the upgrade and maintenance of military aircraft and equipment. As BAL grew, so did the legacy information system it used for both internal communications and external dealings with customers. BAL, however, faced difficult decisions as it sought to upgrade its procurement systems and processes to improve operations. In early 1999, BAL recruited a new national procurement manager, Russell Menere, whose immediate task was to look for gains in productivity by improving procurement processes, either through cost savings or by reduced processing time. To meet this objective, Menere initiated a number of short-term improvements. These included the rationalization of a large number of BAL's suppliers, improving BAL's relationships with its key suppliers; the introduction of a credit-card purchasing system for low-value, large-volume consumables; and the adoption of electronic ordering processes with BAL's larger suppliers. In 2002, with new opportunities available through e-business technology, Menere needed to decide what BAL's next step should be. Should BAL invest in a new system that would simplify the procurement process across different divisions and support complex interfaces with suppliers? Should BAL continue to sit on the fence and seek short-term improvement tools for integration with its existing legacy systems?


Case Authors : Ali Farhoomand, Peta Ashworth

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : IT




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009595) -10009595 - -
Year 1 3444402 -6565193 3444402 0.9434 3249436
Year 2 3974346 -2590847 7418748 0.89 3537154
Year 3 3939642 1348795 11358390 0.8396 3307799
Year 4 3240541 4589336 14598931 0.7921 2566812
TOTAL 14598931 12661201




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651606

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Bal Bal's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Bal Bal's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Bal Bal's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Bal Bal's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009595) -10009595 - -
Year 1 3444402 -6565193 3444402 0.8696 2995132
Year 2 3974346 -2590847 7418748 0.7561 3005177
Year 3 3939642 1348795 11358390 0.6575 2590379
Year 4 3240541 4589336 14598931 0.5718 1852790
TOTAL 10443477


The Net NPV after 4 years is 433882

(10443477 - 10009595 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009595) -10009595 - -
Year 1 3444402 -6565193 3444402 0.8333 2870335
Year 2 3974346 -2590847 7418748 0.6944 2759963
Year 3 3939642 1348795 11358390 0.5787 2279885
Year 4 3240541 4589336 14598931 0.4823 1562761
TOTAL 9472944


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536651

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9472944 - 10009595 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Bal Bal's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Bal Bal's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Bal Bal's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Bal Bal's, then the stock price of the Bal Bal's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Bal Bal's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System

References & Further Readings

Ali Farhoomand, Peta Ashworth (2018), "Boeing Australia Ltd.: Assessing the Merits of Implementing a Sophisticated e-Procurement System Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


LDC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Proactis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Hunan Keli Motor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Selamat Sempurna SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Hongda High-Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Samchuly Bicycle SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Jupiter UK Growth SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Hubei Sanxia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Peninsula Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services