×




Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by R. Edward Freeman, Jenny Mead. The Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A) (referred as “Flight 268” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Ethics, Government, International business, Leadership, Risk management, Social responsibility, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A) Case Study


This is a Darden case study.On February 19, 2005, British Airways flight 268, a 747, took off from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) headed for London's Heathrow Airport. It would be an 11-hour, 5,000-plus-mile flight. Shortly after takeoff, only 296 feet in the air, one of the jet's four engines exploded. The pilots had to determine what course of action to take: return immediately to LAX or continue the flight. This case outlines the various options and the potential consequences of each. See also the B case (UV0774).


Case Authors : R. Edward Freeman, Jenny Mead

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Ethics, Government, International business, Leadership, Risk management, Social responsibility, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018508) -10018508 - -
Year 1 3449762 -6568746 3449762 0.9434 3254492
Year 2 3961300 -2607446 7411062 0.89 3525543
Year 3 3945652 1338206 11356714 0.8396 3312846
Year 4 3243247 4581453 14599961 0.7921 2568955
TOTAL 14599961 12661836




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643328

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Flight 268 have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Flight 268 shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Flight 268 often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Flight 268 needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018508) -10018508 - -
Year 1 3449762 -6568746 3449762 0.8696 2999793
Year 2 3961300 -2607446 7411062 0.7561 2995312
Year 3 3945652 1338206 11356714 0.6575 2594330
Year 4 3243247 4581453 14599961 0.5718 1854337
TOTAL 10443772


The Net NPV after 4 years is 425264

(10443772 - 10018508 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018508) -10018508 - -
Year 1 3449762 -6568746 3449762 0.8333 2874802
Year 2 3961300 -2607446 7411062 0.6944 2750903
Year 3 3945652 1338206 11356714 0.5787 2283363
Year 4 3243247 4581453 14599961 0.4823 1564066
TOTAL 9473134


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545374

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473134 - 10018508 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Flight 268 to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Flight 268 has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Flight 268 can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Flight 268, then the stock price of the Flight 268 should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Flight 268 should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A)

References & Further Readings

R. Edward Freeman, Jenny Mead (2018), "Flying Light: British Airways Flight 268 (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


JinroDistillers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Kolon Industries Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Empresaria SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Mirasol Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Gunsynd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


MMC Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Shinsegae Food SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Hind Syntex Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Zuken Elmic SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming