×




The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Feng Xiong, Larelle Chapple, Haiying Yin. The The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach (referred as “Media Fraud” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Knowledge management, Marketing, Social platforms.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach Case Study


Social media is a rapid and dynamic medium of communication that forms a crucial component of the modern business toolkit. It can be used to detect corporate fraud by tapping into collective user wisdom, also known as the wisdom of crowds. This article highlights both the potential and limitations of social media in detecting corporate fraud by examining information from traditional media and social media for a recent corporate fraud case (i.e., Empowered Products Inc.). Using text analysis of information posted on traditional media compared to social media, this article illustrates how social media provides an increased level of relevant information in a faster manner. By using wisdom of crowds in this way, social media platforms such as Twitter can improve organizational knowledge quality. We identify methods for managers to utilize social media to improve their organizational knowledge management.


Case Authors : Feng Xiong, Larelle Chapple, Haiying Yin

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Knowledge management, Marketing, Social platforms




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022454) -10022454 - -
Year 1 3465278 -6557176 3465278 0.9434 3269130
Year 2 3975448 -2581728 7440726 0.89 3538135
Year 3 3958433 1376705 11399159 0.8396 3323577
Year 4 3239305 4616010 14638464 0.7921 2565833
TOTAL 14638464 12696674




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674220

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Media Fraud have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Media Fraud shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Media Fraud often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Media Fraud needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022454) -10022454 - -
Year 1 3465278 -6557176 3465278 0.8696 3013285
Year 2 3975448 -2581728 7440726 0.7561 3006010
Year 3 3958433 1376705 11399159 0.6575 2602734
Year 4 3239305 4616010 14638464 0.5718 1852083
TOTAL 10474112


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451658

(10474112 - 10022454 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022454) -10022454 - -
Year 1 3465278 -6557176 3465278 0.8333 2887732
Year 2 3975448 -2581728 7440726 0.6944 2760728
Year 3 3958433 1376705 11399159 0.5787 2290760
Year 4 3239305 4616010 14638464 0.4823 1562165
TOTAL 9501384


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521070

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501384 - 10022454 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Media Fraud to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Media Fraud has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Media Fraud can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Media Fraud, then the stock price of the Media Fraud should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Media Fraud should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach

References & Further Readings

Feng Xiong, Larelle Chapple, Haiying Yin (2018), "The Use of Social Media to Detect Corporate Fraud: A Case Study Approach Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Mix Telemats SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Sekisui Plastics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Clearview Wealth SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Starbucks SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)


The Hanover Insurance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Sumida Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Dasin Retail SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


SV Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Indus Building SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations