×




Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Herve Legenvre, Jury Gualandris. The Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success (referred as “Purchasing Sourcing” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success Case Study


Innovation sourcing has become more critical across many industries. As global value chains have become more fragmented, change and opportunity comes from all sides. As a result, companies need to excel at capturing innovation opportunities with existing and potential supply chain members. This article describes a simple framework with three essential innovation sourcing capabilities needed to excel in purchasing: (1) Purchasing needs to explore unmet needs and anticipate future competitive advantages by working closely with other functions and clients; (2) it needs to explore external opportunities beyond first-tier suppliers; and (3) it needs to involve suppliers in innovation projects that consistently deliver results over time. Our framework has been developed based on a combined qualitative and quantitative research methodology that took into account practices and results at the purchasing and company levels. The framework will help C-level managers and purchasing teams benchmark their progress in innovation sourcing and understand what steps need to be taken to achieve excellence.


Case Authors : Herve Legenvre, Jury Gualandris

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005578) -10005578 - -
Year 1 3445540 -6560038 3445540 0.9434 3250509
Year 2 3973293 -2586745 7418833 0.89 3536217
Year 3 3944691 1357946 11363524 0.8396 3312039
Year 4 3242990 4600936 14606514 0.7921 2568752
TOTAL 14606514 12667517




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661939

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Purchasing Sourcing have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Purchasing Sourcing shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Purchasing Sourcing often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Purchasing Sourcing needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005578) -10005578 - -
Year 1 3445540 -6560038 3445540 0.8696 2996122
Year 2 3973293 -2586745 7418833 0.7561 3004380
Year 3 3944691 1357946 11363524 0.6575 2593698
Year 4 3242990 4600936 14606514 0.5718 1854190
TOTAL 10448391


The Net NPV after 4 years is 442813

(10448391 - 10005578 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005578) -10005578 - -
Year 1 3445540 -6560038 3445540 0.8333 2871283
Year 2 3973293 -2586745 7418833 0.6944 2759231
Year 3 3944691 1357946 11363524 0.5787 2282807
Year 4 3242990 4600936 14606514 0.4823 1563942
TOTAL 9477264


The Net NPV after 4 years is -528314

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9477264 - 10005578 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Purchasing Sourcing to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Purchasing Sourcing has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Purchasing Sourcing can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Purchasing Sourcing, then the stock price of the Purchasing Sourcing should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Purchasing Sourcing should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success

References & Further Readings

Herve Legenvre, Jury Gualandris (2018), "Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Indofood Cbp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Oasmia Pharmaceutical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Petro-king Oilfield Services SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


ManTech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


New East New Materials SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Mccoy Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


CNX Midstream SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Avic Sanxin A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


KCTech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Nampak SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging