Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Marie-Renee Lambert, Luciano Barin-Cruz. The Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit (referred as “Acem Acem's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Ethics.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit Case Study

This case study focuses on the Montreal Community Loan Fund (ACEM), which fights poverty and exclusion through the administration of community credit. More specifically, ACEM provides training and offers loans to marginalized and vulnerable people for pre-start-up, start-up, and consolidation of businesses. The case describes ACEM's recent history and how the organization long chose to increase the scale of community credit services through collaborations and partnerships, avoiding for decades the need to grow its own organization. In 2012, ACEM broke with tradition and launched its own scaling process to double its size. The case thus describes an organization trying to stay focused on its social mission and core values while ensuring its own financial stability and protecting the interests of the network of independent community credit organizations that it co-founded. It thus provides an opportunity to discuss the variants of scaling and the challenges faced by a growing not-for-profit organization. The case ends by describing a dilemma regarding ACEM's financial instability. Students will be asked to make a decision regarding the current scaling process and propose a sustainable model that will make ACEM less dependent on government grants while respecting its core values.

Case Authors : Marie-Renee Lambert, Luciano Barin-Cruz

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Ethics

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028357) -10028357 - -
Year 1 3466125 -6562232 3466125 0.9434 3269929
Year 2 3967041 -2595191 7433166 0.89 3530652
Year 3 3975250 1380059 11408416 0.8396 3337697
Year 4 3226003 4606062 14634419 0.7921 2555297
TOTAL 14634419 12693575

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2665218

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Acem Acem's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Acem Acem's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Acem Acem's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Acem Acem's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028357) -10028357 - -
Year 1 3466125 -6562232 3466125 0.8696 3014022
Year 2 3967041 -2595191 7433166 0.7561 2999653
Year 3 3975250 1380059 11408416 0.6575 2613791
Year 4 3226003 4606062 14634419 0.5718 1844478
TOTAL 10471944

The Net NPV after 4 years is 443587

(10471944 - 10028357 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028357) -10028357 - -
Year 1 3466125 -6562232 3466125 0.8333 2888438
Year 2 3967041 -2595191 7433166 0.6944 2754890
Year 3 3975250 1380059 11408416 0.5787 2300492
Year 4 3226003 4606062 14634419 0.4823 1555750
TOTAL 9499569

The Net NPV after 4 years is -528788

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9499569 - 10028357 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Acem Acem's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Acem Acem's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Acem Acem's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Acem Acem's, then the stock price of the Acem Acem's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Acem Acem's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

Negotiation Strategy of Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit

References & Further Readings

Marie-Renee Lambert, Luciano Barin-Cruz (2018), "Can One Size Fit All? The Case of ACEM and Community Credit Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Henderson Diversified SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services

New Concepts SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services

Mastercard SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services

Afrox SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing

Birman SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures

Energy Holdings Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services

Daodaoquan Grain Oil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing

Sidetrade SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming

Mnc Sky Vision SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV