×




Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Amol Dhaigude, Debmallya Chatterjee, Saptarshi Chakrabarti. The Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect (referred as “Ice Kamaths” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect Case Study


Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams Pvt. Ltd., a company located in Mumbai, India, manufactured and distributed ice cream under the brand Natural Ice Cream. The company specialized in using natural flavours in its products, a fact that helped it carve a niche for itself among health-conscious customers. In April 2017, after witnessing great demand for its ice cream across the country, the company's board of directors asked the director of operations to draft a plan to expand manufacturing capacity. As his first step towards this expansion, the director wanted to study the current operations and address any inefficiencies. One aspect that caught his attention was the recent delay in product delivery. Based on his experience, he did not see the company's capacity to fulfill current orders as the reason for delays. Therefore, he decided that the problem was related to the process flow. He would have to find ways to streamline the process to reduce or eliminate all delays in delivery. Amol S. Dhaigude is affiliated with T.A. Pai Management Institute. Debmallya Chatterjee is affiliated with SP Jain Institute of Management & Research.


Case Authors : Amol Dhaigude, Debmallya Chatterjee, Saptarshi Chakrabarti

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019320) -10019320 - -
Year 1 3461432 -6557888 3461432 0.9434 3265502
Year 2 3980507 -2577381 7441939 0.89 3542637
Year 3 3969972 1392591 11411911 0.8396 3333265
Year 4 3240342 4632933 14652253 0.7921 2566654
TOTAL 14652253 12708058




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2688738

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ice Kamaths shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ice Kamaths have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ice Kamaths often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ice Kamaths needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019320) -10019320 - -
Year 1 3461432 -6557888 3461432 0.8696 3009941
Year 2 3980507 -2577381 7441939 0.7561 3009835
Year 3 3969972 1392591 11411911 0.6575 2610321
Year 4 3240342 4632933 14652253 0.5718 1852676
TOTAL 10482773


The Net NPV after 4 years is 463453

(10482773 - 10019320 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019320) -10019320 - -
Year 1 3461432 -6557888 3461432 0.8333 2884527
Year 2 3980507 -2577381 7441939 0.6944 2764241
Year 3 3969972 1392591 11411911 0.5787 2297438
Year 4 3240342 4632933 14652253 0.4823 1562665
TOTAL 9508870


The Net NPV after 4 years is -510450

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9508870 - 10019320 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ice Kamaths to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ice Kamaths has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ice Kamaths can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ice Kamaths, then the stock price of the Ice Kamaths should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ice Kamaths should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect

References & Further Readings

Amol Dhaigude, Debmallya Chatterjee, Saptarshi Chakrabarti (2018), "Kamaths Ourtimes Ice Creams: Eliminating the Bottleneck Effect Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


XIIlab SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


DCB Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Ferrum Crescent SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


FingerMotion SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Pulmatrix SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Stampede Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Shanghai Xintonglian Packaging SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Ashapura Intimates Fashion Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Pitney Bowes SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Liaoning Shidai Wanheng SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories