×




OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Dante Roscini, Emer Moloney, Daniela Beyersdorfer. The OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango (referred as “Omv Petrom” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economy, Government, Joint ventures.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango Case Study


Petrom was privatized by the Romanian state in 2004 and acquired by Austrian oil company OMV, with the state retaining a 20.6% stake in the company. The situation was particularly challenging for the foreign investor since the sector in which the company operated was strategic, was regulated by the Romanian state and the company was a key employer and tax payer in a country that was undergoing major structural change. Under OMV and CEO Mariana Gheorghe's leadership, OMV Petrom saw its net profit and sales almost double since 2005, while headcount was reduced by 50%. Gheorghe had negotiated challenges stemming from Petrom's legacy as a state owned company, such as lack of investment, aged assets, operational inefficiency, and bureaucracy while successfully managing the triangular partnership between the acquirer OMV, acquiree OMV Petrom and the Romanian government.


Case Authors : Dante Roscini, Emer Moloney, Daniela Beyersdorfer

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Economy, Government, Joint ventures




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023532) -10023532 - -
Year 1 3450781 -6572751 3450781 0.9434 3255454
Year 2 3953261 -2619490 7404042 0.89 3518388
Year 3 3937365 1317875 11341407 0.8396 3305888
Year 4 3250007 4567882 14591414 0.7921 2574310
TOTAL 14591414 12654040




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2630508

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Omv Petrom shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Omv Petrom have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Omv Petrom often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Omv Petrom needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023532) -10023532 - -
Year 1 3450781 -6572751 3450781 0.8696 3000679
Year 2 3953261 -2619490 7404042 0.7561 2989233
Year 3 3937365 1317875 11341407 0.6575 2588881
Year 4 3250007 4567882 14591414 0.5718 1858202
TOTAL 10436996


The Net NPV after 4 years is 413464

(10436996 - 10023532 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023532) -10023532 - -
Year 1 3450781 -6572751 3450781 0.8333 2875651
Year 2 3953261 -2619490 7404042 0.6944 2745320
Year 3 3937365 1317875 11341407 0.5787 2278568
Year 4 3250007 4567882 14591414 0.4823 1567326
TOTAL 9466865


The Net NPV after 4 years is -556667

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9466865 - 10023532 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Omv Petrom to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Omv Petrom has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Omv Petrom can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Omv Petrom, then the stock price of the Omv Petrom should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Omv Petrom should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango

References & Further Readings

Dante Roscini, Emer Moloney, Daniela Beyersdorfer (2018), "OMV Petrom: Investment as Partnership-When It Takes Three to Tango Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


MEDIFAST SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Victek SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Esense-Lab SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Secom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


Wam Capital Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Synchro Food SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Yumeshin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services