×




Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Samuel E Bodily, D. Matthew Coleman. The Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts (referred as “Nephila Weather” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Financial markets, Negotiations, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts Case Study


The weather team at Nephila Capital Ltd. (Nephila) was in the midst of the weather market's busy winter renewal period. The list of weather risk transfer contracts that needed to be analyzed and priced seemed to be growing by the minute, and one team member is devising a plan to price each deal on its own merits of risk/reward. The counterparty's bid would reflect the willingness of the contracting party to pay for a weather hedge, and none would pay more than the bid amount. Nephila wanted to meet the needs of each counterparty, but only if Nephila earned a requisite return on capital. If the bid amount were not high enough to be attractive to Nephila, the team would need to convey that news to the counterparties. Did these new deal opportunities offer something more to Nephila beyond their individual numbers?


Case Authors : Samuel E Bodily, D. Matthew Coleman

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Financial markets, Negotiations, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004267) -10004267 - -
Year 1 3451419 -6552848 3451419 0.9434 3256056
Year 2 3962093 -2590755 7413512 0.89 3526249
Year 3 3960911 1370156 11374423 0.8396 3325657
Year 4 3222790 4592946 14597213 0.7921 2552752
TOTAL 14597213 12660713




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656446

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nephila Weather shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nephila Weather have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nephila Weather often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nephila Weather needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004267) -10004267 - -
Year 1 3451419 -6552848 3451419 0.8696 3001234
Year 2 3962093 -2590755 7413512 0.7561 2995912
Year 3 3960911 1370156 11374423 0.6575 2604363
Year 4 3222790 4592946 14597213 0.5718 1842641
TOTAL 10444149


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439882

(10444149 - 10004267 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004267) -10004267 - -
Year 1 3451419 -6552848 3451419 0.8333 2876183
Year 2 3962093 -2590755 7413512 0.6944 2751453
Year 3 3960911 1370156 11374423 0.5787 2292194
Year 4 3222790 4592946 14597213 0.4823 1554200
TOTAL 9474030


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530237

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9474030 - 10004267 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nephila Weather to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nephila Weather has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nephila Weather can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nephila Weather, then the stock price of the Nephila Weather should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nephila Weather should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts

References & Further Readings

Samuel E Bodily, D. Matthew Coleman (2018), "Nephila Builds a Portfolio of Weather Risk Transfer Contracts Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Vault Intelligence SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Oragenics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


ETV California MBF SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Keywords Studios SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Hindustan Unilever SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Pixelplus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Fresenius SE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Natixis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Karnalyte Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining


Dts8 Coffee Company SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


DMH SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories