×




Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Anne Beyer, Jaclyn C. Foroughi. The Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG (referred as “Depreciation Expense” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Budgeting, Performance measurement, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG Case Study


As one of the most highly capital-intensive industries, airlines require a substantial investment in physical assets to fund operations. These assets, characterized by property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) on the balance sheet, typically comprise more than half of the total assets of an airline. As a result, depreciation of these assets constitutes a major operating expense. Although methods and estimates used for determining depreciation expense can differ across industries, it is not uncommon for similar divergence to occur among companies within the same industry as well. Aircraft-related depreciation expense is determined by estimating the useful life and the residual value of the aircraft. These estimates can vary widely amongst airlines as a result of many factors including differences in corporate strategy, flying patterns, and fleet composition. As a result, differing practices and expectations can have a significant impact on each airline's reported financial results.


Case Authors : Anne Beyer, Jaclyn C. Foroughi

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Budgeting, Performance measurement, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023533) -10023533 - -
Year 1 3457053 -6566480 3457053 0.9434 3261371
Year 2 3965202 -2601278 7422255 0.89 3529016
Year 3 3964310 1363032 11386565 0.8396 3328511
Year 4 3248629 4611661 14635194 0.7921 2573218
TOTAL 14635194 12692116




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2668583

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Depreciation Expense have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Depreciation Expense shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Depreciation Expense often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Depreciation Expense needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023533) -10023533 - -
Year 1 3457053 -6566480 3457053 0.8696 3006133
Year 2 3965202 -2601278 7422255 0.7561 2998262
Year 3 3964310 1363032 11386565 0.6575 2606598
Year 4 3248629 4611661 14635194 0.5718 1857414
TOTAL 10468408


The Net NPV after 4 years is 444875

(10468408 - 10023533 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023533) -10023533 - -
Year 1 3457053 -6566480 3457053 0.8333 2880878
Year 2 3965202 -2601278 7422255 0.6944 2753613
Year 3 3964310 1363032 11386565 0.5787 2294161
Year 4 3248629 4611661 14635194 0.4823 1566661
TOTAL 9495312


The Net NPV after 4 years is -528221

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495312 - 10023533 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Depreciation Expense to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Depreciation Expense has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Depreciation Expense can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Depreciation Expense, then the stock price of the Depreciation Expense should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Depreciation Expense should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG

References & Further Readings

Anne Beyer, Jaclyn C. Foroughi (2018), "Depreciation at Deutsche Lufthansa AG Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Huamao Textile A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Shandong Luyitong Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Industrias JBDuarte SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


SysGroup PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


JBF Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Shenyang Jinbei Auto SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Freeman FinTech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Anant Raj SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services