×




Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Emir Hrnjic. The Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015) (referred as “Shares Aa” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial markets, Innovation, Manufacturing, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015) Case Study


In June 2015, the Toyota Motor Corporation's annual shareholders' meeting included a proposal regarding Toyota's new share issue. Named "Model AA" shares after the company's first passenger car, the shares would offer investors new hybrid securities. This proposal created a lot of controversy among existing shareholders. Although President Toyoda claimed that no one would be disadvantaged by these shares, it remained unclear how many shareholders had confidence in this assurance. The share issue, which would potentially comprise up to 5 per cent of Toyota's total outstanding shares, would require the support of a two-thirds majority of shareholders. The new shares looked like ordinary shares with a "lock-up" period or preferred shares with voting rights. At the same time, Model AA shares resembled a convertible debt issue with voting rights (with a conversion ratio to be determined later). It was time to vote on the approval of Toyota's new share issue, but the following questions lingered in the shareholders' minds: What exactly was the difference between Model AA shares and ordinary shares? What was the difference between Model AA shares and bonds (or convertible bonds)? Finally, if the vote was approved, how should Model AA shares be priced? Emir HrnjiA‡ is affiliated with National University of Singapore.


Case Authors : Emir Hrnjic

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial markets, Innovation, Manufacturing, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027604) -10027604 - -
Year 1 3471099 -6556505 3471099 0.9434 3274622
Year 2 3966143 -2590362 7437242 0.89 3529853
Year 3 3972112 1381750 11409354 0.8396 3335062
Year 4 3237810 4619560 14647164 0.7921 2564649
TOTAL 14647164 12704185




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676581

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Shares Aa shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Shares Aa have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Shares Aa often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Shares Aa needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027604) -10027604 - -
Year 1 3471099 -6556505 3471099 0.8696 3018347
Year 2 3966143 -2590362 7437242 0.7561 2998974
Year 3 3972112 1381750 11409354 0.6575 2611728
Year 4 3237810 4619560 14647164 0.5718 1851228
TOTAL 10480277


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452673

(10480277 - 10027604 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027604) -10027604 - -
Year 1 3471099 -6556505 3471099 0.8333 2892583
Year 2 3966143 -2590362 7437242 0.6944 2754266
Year 3 3972112 1381750 11409354 0.5787 2298676
Year 4 3237810 4619560 14647164 0.4823 1561444
TOTAL 9506968


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520636

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9506968 - 10027604 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Shares Aa to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Shares Aa has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Shares Aa can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Shares Aa, then the stock price of the Shares Aa should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Shares Aa should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015)

References & Further Readings

Emir Hrnjic (2018), "Toyota's Innovative Share Issue (2015) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Motic Xiamen Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Ashima Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Beijing Sdl Technology A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


MasTec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


GDS Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Gmo Research SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


BioTime SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


PulteGroup SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services