×




MySoftware Co. (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for MySoftware Co. (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. MySoftware Co. (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by H. Kent Bowen, Nicole Tempest. The MySoftware Co. (A) (referred as “Slayton Mysoftware” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Internet, IT, Joint ventures, Labor, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of MySoftware Co. (A) Case Study


In 1997, Gregory Slayton took the position as CEO of MySoftware, which had been experiencing revenue and operating losses for the past two years. Within 90 days, he stabilized the company through a combination of cost cutting, financial discipline, and accountability at all levels of the organization, and aligning employee and customer incentives with corporate goals. The challenge ahead was to return the company to profitable growth. Slayton and his management team identified four potential growth opportunities for the company: 1) building its profitable annuity-based products, 2) expanding its distribution channels, 3) increasing its partnerships with OEMs, and 4) pursuing a new Internet business opportunity. He knew he would need to consider the revenue potential of each opportunity, and the investment, resources, and level of management attention required. He would also have to gauge the impact that these factors would have on MySoftware's core business. Slayton and his team were meeting the following week to make a final decision on which of the four opportunities the company should pursue over the next year.


Case Authors : H. Kent Bowen, Nicole Tempest

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Internet, IT, Joint ventures, Labor, Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for MySoftware Co. (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012141) -10012141 - -
Year 1 3465031 -6547110 3465031 0.9434 3268897
Year 2 3973318 -2573792 7438349 0.89 3536239
Year 3 3948952 1375160 11387301 0.8396 3315616
Year 4 3234836 4609996 14622137 0.7921 2562293
TOTAL 14622137 12683045




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670904

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Slayton Mysoftware have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Slayton Mysoftware shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of MySoftware Co. (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Slayton Mysoftware often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Slayton Mysoftware needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012141) -10012141 - -
Year 1 3465031 -6547110 3465031 0.8696 3013070
Year 2 3973318 -2573792 7438349 0.7561 3004399
Year 3 3948952 1375160 11387301 0.6575 2596500
Year 4 3234836 4609996 14622137 0.5718 1849528
TOTAL 10463498


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451357

(10463498 - 10012141 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012141) -10012141 - -
Year 1 3465031 -6547110 3465031 0.8333 2887526
Year 2 3973318 -2573792 7438349 0.6944 2759249
Year 3 3948952 1375160 11387301 0.5787 2285273
Year 4 3234836 4609996 14622137 0.4823 1560010
TOTAL 9492057


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520084

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492057 - 10012141 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Slayton Mysoftware to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Slayton Mysoftware has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Slayton Mysoftware can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Slayton Mysoftware, then the stock price of the Slayton Mysoftware should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Slayton Mysoftware should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of MySoftware Co. (A)

References & Further Readings

H. Kent Bowen, Nicole Tempest (2018), "MySoftware Co. (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Guangdong Mingzhu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Haitong Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Bros Eastern SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Hazer Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Swiber Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Alexander Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Zhejiang Kanglongda Special SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Aisino Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming