×




General Scanning, Inc. (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for General Scanning, Inc. (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. General Scanning, Inc. (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by H. Kent Bowen, Charles Tillen, Sean McClenaghan. The General Scanning, Inc. (B) (referred as “Scanning Winston” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Operations management, Reorganization, Research & development, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of General Scanning, Inc. (B) Case Study


After meeting with a mediator, Montagu and Davis decided their goals were not in accordance, and Davis left General Scanning. Montagu and Brosens wrote three-year objectives for the company and proceeded to search for a new professional manager. Chuck Winston took on the role of CEO/president with the goals of growth, profitability, consistency, and solid management. Winston decentralized the company by forming four separate divisions: Recorder Products, Laser Systems, Optical Scanning, and Laser Graphics. By the end of 1994, General Scanning was worth over $76 million, was showing a profit with a strong balance sheet, and had over 1,000 customers. Having turned around the company and grown it threefold, Winston and the founders need to decide what to do next: merge, acquire, do an IPO, or spinoff the successful Laser Systems division. There remained the haunting issue that most of the stock was held by the two founders. The case discussion challenges students to deal with the core problem of managing this technology company--that is, formally changing the roles of the founders by changing the ownership and board of directors.


Case Authors : H. Kent Bowen, Charles Tillen, Sean McClenaghan

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Operations management, Reorganization, Research & development, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for General Scanning, Inc. (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003598) -10003598 - -
Year 1 3459249 -6544349 3459249 0.9434 3263442
Year 2 3981250 -2563099 7440499 0.89 3543298
Year 3 3969198 1406099 11409697 0.8396 3332615
Year 4 3246292 4652391 14655989 0.7921 2571367
TOTAL 14655989 12710723




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2707125

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Scanning Winston have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Scanning Winston shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of General Scanning, Inc. (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Scanning Winston often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Scanning Winston needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003598) -10003598 - -
Year 1 3459249 -6544349 3459249 0.8696 3008043
Year 2 3981250 -2563099 7440499 0.7561 3010397
Year 3 3969198 1406099 11409697 0.6575 2609812
Year 4 3246292 4652391 14655989 0.5718 1856078
TOTAL 10484330


The Net NPV after 4 years is 480732

(10484330 - 10003598 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003598) -10003598 - -
Year 1 3459249 -6544349 3459249 0.8333 2882708
Year 2 3981250 -2563099 7440499 0.6944 2764757
Year 3 3969198 1406099 11409697 0.5787 2296990
Year 4 3246292 4652391 14655989 0.4823 1565534
TOTAL 9509988


The Net NPV after 4 years is -493610

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9509988 - 10003598 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Scanning Winston to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Scanning Winston has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Scanning Winston can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Scanning Winston, then the stock price of the Scanning Winston should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Scanning Winston should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of General Scanning, Inc. (B)

References & Further Readings

H. Kent Bowen, Charles Tillen, Sean McClenaghan (2018), "General Scanning, Inc. (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Nitto Boseki SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


LMS Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Avenir Telecom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Technology)


Japan U-Pica SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Abbott Labs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


H&R Block SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Personal Services


Marine General SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


SodaStream SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)


Emilia Devel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


TH Heavy Engineering Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Italk Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls