×




Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Frank V. Cespedes, Thomas R. Eisenmann, Steven G. Blank. The Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs (referred as “Technique Entrepreneurial” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Innovation, Market research, Sales, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs Case Study


Provides practical guidelines for conducting market research to explore and validate demand for entrepreneurial offering. Explains how the research objectives of entrepreneurs might differ from those relevant to managers evaluating product or service offerings to established markets. For each of several research techniques, specifies conditions under which the technique is most likely to yield valuable insights; describes how the technique should be adapted for use in an entrepreneurial context; and offers tips and cautions about applying the technique. The techniques include customer surveys, usability tests, market trials, split tests, and Net Promoter Score. Appendices discuss the use of focus groups and conjoint analysis in an entrepreneurial context. The Note is therefore suitable for use in MBA, Executive Education, Field Study, or project contexts where the focus is startups, new business development, product development, or innovation.


Case Authors : Frank V. Cespedes, Thomas R. Eisenmann, Steven G. Blank

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Innovation, Market research, Sales, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023662) -10023662 - -
Year 1 3463590 -6560072 3463590 0.9434 3267538
Year 2 3958989 -2601083 7422579 0.89 3523486
Year 3 3959940 1358857 11382519 0.8396 3324842
Year 4 3235537 4594394 14618056 0.7921 2562848
TOTAL 14618056 12678714




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2655052

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Technique Entrepreneurial shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Technique Entrepreneurial have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Technique Entrepreneurial often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Technique Entrepreneurial needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023662) -10023662 - -
Year 1 3463590 -6560072 3463590 0.8696 3011817
Year 2 3958989 -2601083 7422579 0.7561 2993564
Year 3 3959940 1358857 11382519 0.6575 2603725
Year 4 3235537 4594394 14618056 0.5718 1849929
TOTAL 10459035


The Net NPV after 4 years is 435373

(10459035 - 10023662 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023662) -10023662 - -
Year 1 3463590 -6560072 3463590 0.8333 2886325
Year 2 3958989 -2601083 7422579 0.6944 2749298
Year 3 3959940 1358857 11382519 0.5787 2291632
Year 4 3235537 4594394 14618056 0.4823 1560348
TOTAL 9487603


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536059

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487603 - 10023662 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Technique Entrepreneurial to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Technique Entrepreneurial has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Technique Entrepreneurial can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Technique Entrepreneurial, then the stock price of the Technique Entrepreneurial should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Technique Entrepreneurial should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs

References & Further Readings

Frank V. Cespedes, Thomas R. Eisenmann, Steven G. Blank (2018), "Customer Discovery and Validation for Entrepreneurs Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Pine Technology Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Storage Devices


Faith Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


JMT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Targovax SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Okayama Paper Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Uzma Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Sing Investments & Finance Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Coloray International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.