×




Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Pamela Yatsko. The Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In (referred as “Education Public” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In Case Study


If you want to create change in public education but are not a school principal or other traditional public education leader, what do you need to do? This long, integrated background note examines the inspiring models and stories of individuals who are improving outcomes for low-income students through innovative social ventures. It shows how small innovations that start outside the traditional public education establishment get off the ground and overcome obstacles; how, if properly set up and tended, they can scale to multiple sites to move inside the "school building" for greater impact. They demonstrate the advanced leadership skills, tools, and principles that courageous education innovators everywhere can use to guide their thinking from outside the school building in.


Case Authors : Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Pamela Yatsko

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Leadership, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021417) -10021417 - -
Year 1 3457704 -6563713 3457704 0.9434 3261985
Year 2 3981454 -2582259 7439158 0.89 3543480
Year 3 3954696 1372437 11393854 0.8396 3320439
Year 4 3230752 4603189 14624606 0.7921 2559058
TOTAL 14624606 12684962




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2663545

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Education Public have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Education Public shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Education Public often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Education Public needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021417) -10021417 - -
Year 1 3457704 -6563713 3457704 0.8696 3006699
Year 2 3981454 -2582259 7439158 0.7561 3010551
Year 3 3954696 1372437 11393854 0.6575 2600277
Year 4 3230752 4603189 14624606 0.5718 1847193
TOTAL 10464720


The Net NPV after 4 years is 443303

(10464720 - 10021417 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021417) -10021417 - -
Year 1 3457704 -6563713 3457704 0.8333 2881420
Year 2 3981454 -2582259 7439158 0.6944 2764899
Year 3 3954696 1372437 11393854 0.5787 2288597
Year 4 3230752 4603189 14624606 0.4823 1558040
TOTAL 9492956


The Net NPV after 4 years is -528461

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492956 - 10021417 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Education Public to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Education Public has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Education Public can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Education Public, then the stock price of the Education Public should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Education Public should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In

References & Further Readings

Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Pamela Yatsko (2018), "Advanced Leadership in Public Education: Tools for Tackling Change from Outside the Building In Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kycom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Sundaram Multi Pap Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Xiamen Airport SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Infigen Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Edion Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Yamazaki Baking Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Solueta SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls