×




Cameco in Kyrgyzstan: Corporate Social Responsibility Abroad Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Cameco in Kyrgyzstan: Corporate Social Responsibility Abroad case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Cameco in Kyrgyzstan: Corporate Social Responsibility Abroad case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Pratima Bansal, John Scarfe, Russell Johnston. The Cameco in Kyrgyzstan: Corporate Social Responsibility Abroad (referred as “Kyrgyzstan Cameco” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Decision making, Government, International business, Social responsibility, Strategy, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment




Case Description of Cameco in Kyrgyzstan: Corporate Social Responsibility Abroad Case Study


Based in Saskatoon, Canada, Cameco was the world's largest uranium mining company. It had developed its policy for corporate social responsibility in northern Saskatchewan, where it had its major mining operations and where there was a large indigenous population of Cree and Dene Indians. Centers on whether the same corporate social responsibility policy can be applied to the company's joint venture with the Kyrgyzstan government to operate a gold mine in eastern Kyrgyzstan. Complicating the decision is a chemical spill that had occurred several months before; relations with citizens in nearby communities were at an all-time low. The joint venture's vice-president of human resources and corporate relations must decide which of the programs might be successfully implemented in Kyrgyzstan, what new programs might need to be developed, and how best to communicate company policy to the local community.


Case Authors : Pratima Bansal, John Scarfe, Russell Johnston

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Decision making, Government, International business, Social responsibility, Strategy, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Cameco in Kyrgyzstan: Corporate Social Responsibility Abroad Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025173) -10025173 - -
Year 1 3444704 -6580469 3444704 0.9434 3249721
Year 2 3967738 -2612731 7412442 0.89 3531273
Year 3 3938358 1325627 11350800 0.8396 3306721
Year 4 3242907 4568534 14593707 0.7921 2568686
TOTAL 14593707 12656401


The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2631228

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kyrgyzstan Cameco have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kyrgyzstan Cameco shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.




Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Cameco in Kyrgyzstan: Corporate Social Responsibility Abroad

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kyrgyzstan Cameco often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kyrgyzstan Cameco needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025173) -10025173 - -
Year 1 3444704 -6580469 3444704 0.8696 2995395
Year 2 3967738 -2612731 7412442 0.7561 3000180
Year 3 3938358 1325627 11350800 0.6575 2589534
Year 4 3242907 4568534 14593707 0.5718 1854143
TOTAL 10439252


The Net NPV after 4 years is 414079

(10439252 - 10025173 )






Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025173) -10025173 - -
Year 1 3444704 -6580469 3444704 0.8333 2870587
Year 2 3967738 -2612731 7412442 0.6944 2755374
Year 3 3938358 1325627 11350800 0.5787 2279142
Year 4 3242907 4568534 14593707 0.4823 1563902
TOTAL 9469005


The Net NPV after 4 years is -556168

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9469005 - 10025173 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kyrgyzstan Cameco to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.



Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kyrgyzstan Cameco has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kyrgyzstan Cameco can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kyrgyzstan Cameco, then the stock price of the Kyrgyzstan Cameco should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kyrgyzstan Cameco should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.




References & Further Readings

Pratima Bansal, John Scarfe, Russell Johnston (2018), "Cameco in Kyrgyzstan: Corporate Social Responsibility Abroad Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.