×




Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Won-Yong Oh, Minsoo Seo, Michelle Jin. The Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further (referred as “Porter Airlines” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further Case Study


In 2013, the chief executive officer of Porter Airlines, a Toronto-based regional airline, announced an expansion project to expand the airline's destinations. The project required that Porter Airlines expand its fleet of jets to accommodate longer distances, and that its transport hub, the Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport, be renovated. The airport was governed by a tripartite agreement between the federal government, the City of Toronto, and PortsToronto; any amendments to the agreement required a consensus of the three governing parties. Despite active petitioning, the federal government announced in 2015 it would not support an amendment to the agreement. Should Porter Airlines continue to petition? Or should it consider alternative options to achieve growth? Won-Yong Oh is affiliated with University of Calgary.


Case Authors : Won-Yong Oh, Minsoo Seo, Michelle Jin

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026366) -10026366 - -
Year 1 3456646 -6569720 3456646 0.9434 3260987
Year 2 3979670 -2590050 7436316 0.89 3541892
Year 3 3957647 1367597 11393963 0.8396 3322917
Year 4 3226065 4593662 14620028 0.7921 2555346
TOTAL 14620028 12681141




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654775

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Porter Airlines shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Porter Airlines have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Porter Airlines often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Porter Airlines needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026366) -10026366 - -
Year 1 3456646 -6569720 3456646 0.8696 3005779
Year 2 3979670 -2590050 7436316 0.7561 3009202
Year 3 3957647 1367597 11393963 0.6575 2602217
Year 4 3226065 4593662 14620028 0.5718 1844513
TOTAL 10461712


The Net NPV after 4 years is 435346

(10461712 - 10026366 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10026366) -10026366 - -
Year 1 3456646 -6569720 3456646 0.8333 2880538
Year 2 3979670 -2590050 7436316 0.6944 2763660
Year 3 3957647 1367597 11393963 0.5787 2290305
Year 4 3226065 4593662 14620028 0.4823 1555780
TOTAL 9490283


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536083

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490283 - 10026366 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Porter Airlines to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Porter Airlines has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Porter Airlines can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Porter Airlines, then the stock price of the Porter Airlines should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Porter Airlines should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further

References & Further Readings

Won-Yong Oh, Minsoo Seo, Michelle Jin (2018), "Porter Airlines: We Want to Fly You Further Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hanger SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Chugoku Marine Paints SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


FireEye SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


The Phoenix Mills SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


IF Bancorp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Pacific Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Bharati Defence SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Oceanus Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Titan Wind Energy Suzhou SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods