×




Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joseph Facal. The Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter (referred as “Getter Excalibur” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Ethics, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter Case Study


A young engineer at a major Quebec construction company realizes that, over time, he has placed himself in a tricky legal and ethical position: at the request of his immediate superior, a man he respects and to whom he feels indebted, he has repeatedly falsified cost estimates for the public works projects his company is bidding on. The young man thinks about what he should do and the potential impact of his decision on his career and loved ones.


Case Authors : Joseph Facal

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Ethics, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001219) -10001219 - -
Year 1 3470510 -6530709 3470510 0.9434 3274066
Year 2 3962225 -2568484 7432735 0.89 3526366
Year 3 3942444 1373960 11375179 0.8396 3310152
Year 4 3240496 4614456 14615675 0.7921 2566776
TOTAL 14615675 12677361




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676142

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Getter Excalibur have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Getter Excalibur shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Getter Excalibur often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Getter Excalibur needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001219) -10001219 - -
Year 1 3470510 -6530709 3470510 0.8696 3017835
Year 2 3962225 -2568484 7432735 0.7561 2996011
Year 3 3942444 1373960 11375179 0.6575 2592221
Year 4 3240496 4614456 14615675 0.5718 1852764
TOTAL 10458831


The Net NPV after 4 years is 457612

(10458831 - 10001219 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001219) -10001219 - -
Year 1 3470510 -6530709 3470510 0.8333 2892092
Year 2 3962225 -2568484 7432735 0.6944 2751545
Year 3 3942444 1373960 11375179 0.5787 2281507
Year 4 3240496 4614456 14615675 0.4823 1562739
TOTAL 9487883


The Net NPV after 4 years is -513336

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487883 - 10001219 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Getter Excalibur to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Getter Excalibur has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Getter Excalibur can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Getter Excalibur, then the stock price of the Getter Excalibur should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Getter Excalibur should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter

References & Further Readings

Joseph Facal (2018), "Excalibur Construction or the Dilemma of the Young Go-Getter Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Guanghe Landscape SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Fengfan Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


DongKoo Bio Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Kolao Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Galore Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


MongoDB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Coca-Cola European SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)


Brompton Split Banc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services