×




Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version


You can order --casename-- analysis and solution here

Authors :: Ashish Nanda, Lauren Prusiner

Topics :: Strategy & Execution

Tags :: Joint ventures, Leadership, Managing people, Mergers & acquisitions, Organizational structure, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version" written by Ashish Nanda, Lauren Prusiner includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Ownership Casename facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Joint ventures, Leadership, Managing people, Mergers & acquisitions, Organizational structure and Strategy & Execution.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version casestudy better are - – increasing energy prices, increasing commodity prices, competitive advantages are harder to sustain because of technology dispersion, digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, increasing transportation and logistics costs, geopolitical disruptions, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, there is increasing trade war between United States & China, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Ownership Casename, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Ownership Casename operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Ownership Casename
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Strategy & Execution field.
4. Making a Strategy & Execution topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Ownership Casename




Strengths Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Ownership Casename in Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review case study are -

Ability to recruit top talent

– Ownership Casename is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Organizational Resilience of Ownership Casename

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Ownership Casename does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Innovation driven organization

– Ownership Casename is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Ownership Casename in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

Training and development

– Ownership Casename has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Ownership Casename has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Ownership Casename has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Learning organization

- Ownership Casename is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Ownership Casename is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

High brand equity

– Ownership Casename has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Ownership Casename to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Strategy & Execution industry

– Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Ownership Casename to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Strategy & Execution industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Ownership Casename to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Low bargaining power of suppliers

– Suppliers of Ownership Casename in the sector have low bargaining power. Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version has further diversified its suppliers portfolio by building a robust supply chain across various countries. This helps Ownership Casename to manage not only supply disruptions but also source products at highly competitive prices.

Ability to lead change in Strategy & Execution field

– Ownership Casename is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Ownership Casename in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.






Weaknesses Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version are -

High dependence on star products

– The top 2 products and services of the firm as mentioned in the Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version HBR case study still accounts for major business revenue. This dependence on star products in has resulted into insufficient focus on developing new products, even though Ownership Casename has relatively successful track record of launching new products.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version, in the dynamic environment Ownership Casename has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Ownership Casename has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Need for greater diversity

– Ownership Casename has taken concrete steps on diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the efforts so far has resulted in limited success. It needs to expand the recruitment and selection process to hire more people from the minorities and underprivileged background.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version, it seems that the employees of Ownership Casename don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Ownership Casename is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Strategy & Execution segment. Ownership Casename needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Ownership Casename to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Ownership Casename has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version HBR case study mentions - Ownership Casename takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Strategy & Execution strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Ownership Casename, firm in the HBR case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Ownership Casename has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Ownership Casename supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version, it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Ownership Casename vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.




Opportunities Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version are -

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Ownership Casename can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Ownership Casename operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Strategy & Execution sector.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Ownership Casename to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Ownership Casename to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Ownership Casename can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Strategy & Execution segment.

Manufacturing automation

– Ownership Casename can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Strategy & Execution segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Strategy & Execution industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Ownership Casename can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Ownership Casename can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Ownership Casename can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Ownership Casename has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Ownership Casename to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Developing new processes and practices

– Ownership Casename can develop new processes and procedures in Strategy & Execution industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Ownership Casename to increase its market reach. Ownership Casename will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Ownership Casename to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Ownership Casename is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Ownership Casename can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Ownership Casename can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version, to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.




Threats Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version are -

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Ownership Casename.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Ownership Casename can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version .

Consumer confidence and its impact on Ownership Casename demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Ownership Casename high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Increasing wage structure of Ownership Casename

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Ownership Casename.

Regulatory challenges

– Ownership Casename needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Strategy & Execution industry regulations.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Ownership Casename in the Strategy & Execution industry. The Strategy & Execution industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Ownership Casename can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Ownership Casename will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Environmental challenges

– Ownership Casename needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Ownership Casename can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Strategy & Execution industry.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Ownership Casename has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Strategy & Execution industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Ownership Casename needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Strategy & Execution sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Ownership Structure in Professional Service Firms: Partnership vs. Public Corporation, Spanish Version is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Ownership Casename needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Closed-End Funds at Saba Capital Management SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Sara Fleiss, Adi Sunderam , Finance & Accounting


Turkish Economy Bank and Fortis Bank: Managing a Complex Merger SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Stuart C. Gilson, Esel Cekin, Sarah L. Abbott , Finance & Accounting


InPart SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Joseph B. Lassiter, Michael J. Roberts, Jon M. Biotti , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Prague Post SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Paul A. Gompers , Finance & Accounting


AXA MONY SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Andre F. Perold, Lucy White , Finance & Accounting


Eastern Bank Ltd. (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Terry H. Deutscher, Kaiser Islam , Sales & Marketing


Matt Harris at Village Ventures (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John W. Glynn Jr., Janet Feldstein , Innovation & Entrepreneurship