Gary Loveman: Paths to Power (2012) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Gary Loveman: Paths to Power (2012) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Gary Loveman: Paths to Power (2012) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jeffrey Pfeffer. The Gary Loveman: Paths to Power (2012) (referred as “Loveman Relationships” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Influence, Leadership, Managing people.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Gary Loveman: Paths to Power (2012) Case Study

Gary Loveman, a former assistant professor at Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, became Chief Operating Officer of Harrah's Entertainment in 1998. He was an outsider in a very insular business who had no significant administrative or managerial experience. In this video, Loveman discusses his definition of success, his strategy for achieving it, and how everyone who reported to him believed that he or she was a better candidate for the COO position than Loveman was. He talks about critical relationships and how to serve those relationships on a daily basis so that key people do not feel marginalized or cut out. Loveman also explains that as one moves into senior positions, he or she no longer has the luxury of relationships not working. Instead, senior executives are responsible for making critical relationships work so that the company is well served.

Case Authors : Jeffrey Pfeffer

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Influence, Leadership, Managing people

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Gary Loveman: Paths to Power (2012) Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019186) -10019186 - -
Year 1 3463675 -6555511 3463675 0.9434 3267618
Year 2 3955610 -2599901 7419285 0.89 3520479
Year 3 3945316 1345415 11364601 0.8396 3312563
Year 4 3234444 4579859 14599045 0.7921 2561983
TOTAL 14599045 12662643

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643457

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Loveman Relationships have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Loveman Relationships shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Gary Loveman: Paths to Power (2012)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Loveman Relationships often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Loveman Relationships needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019186) -10019186 - -
Year 1 3463675 -6555511 3463675 0.8696 3011891
Year 2 3955610 -2599901 7419285 0.7561 2991009
Year 3 3945316 1345415 11364601 0.6575 2594109
Year 4 3234444 4579859 14599045 0.5718 1849304
TOTAL 10446314

The Net NPV after 4 years is 427128

(10446314 - 10019186 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019186) -10019186 - -
Year 1 3463675 -6555511 3463675 0.8333 2886396
Year 2 3955610 -2599901 7419285 0.6944 2746951
Year 3 3945316 1345415 11364601 0.5787 2283169
Year 4 3234444 4579859 14599045 0.4823 1559821
TOTAL 9476337

The Net NPV after 4 years is -542849

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476337 - 10019186 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Loveman Relationships to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Loveman Relationships has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Loveman Relationships can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Loveman Relationships, then the stock price of the Loveman Relationships should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Loveman Relationships should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Jeffrey Pfeffer (2018), "Gary Loveman: Paths to Power (2012) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.