The Panic of 1907 and the High Tide of Progressivism (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Panic of 1907 and the High Tide of Progressivism (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Panic of 1907 and the High Tide of Progressivism (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert F. Bruner. The The Panic of 1907 and the High Tide of Progressivism (A) (referred as “Panic 1907” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Government.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of The Panic of 1907 and the High Tide of Progressivism (A) Case Study

In June 1913, President Woodrow Wilson confronts a legislative deadlock over terms to define a new Federal Reserve Bank for the United States. The recent panic of 1907 triggered a major civic reaction that sought to dispense with a 100-year-old antipathy to central banking. Now, Wilson must decide how best to harness the civic reaction in framing a new central bank. Wilson's dilemma occurs in the midst of a dramatic regime shift in American politics. The rise of Populists and Progressive politicians in reaction to the rapid transformation of America in the Gilded Age marks 1913 as a historic pivot point. It is useful to consider how the panic of 1907 contributed to that pivot and how the public subsequently reacted to the panic. This case and its supplemental B case are a vehicle for illuminating the dynamics of financial crises, comparing systems for financial stability such as clearinghouse associations and central banks, considering the origin of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, and exploring the dynamics of government policy making in the context of a regime shift in political sentiment.

Case Authors : Robert F. Bruner

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Government

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Panic of 1907 and the High Tide of Progressivism (A) Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009670) -10009670 - -
Year 1 3455628 -6554042 3455628 0.9434 3260026
Year 2 3977421 -2576621 7433049 0.89 3539891
Year 3 3959865 1383244 11392914 0.8396 3324779
Year 4 3224747 4607991 14617661 0.7921 2554302
TOTAL 14617661 12678998

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2669328

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Panic 1907 shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Panic 1907 have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Panic of 1907 and the High Tide of Progressivism (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Panic 1907 often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Panic 1907 needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009670) -10009670 - -
Year 1 3455628 -6554042 3455628 0.8696 3004894
Year 2 3977421 -2576621 7433049 0.7561 3007502
Year 3 3959865 1383244 11392914 0.6575 2603676
Year 4 3224747 4607991 14617661 0.5718 1843760
TOTAL 10459831

The Net NPV after 4 years is 450161

(10459831 - 10009670 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009670) -10009670 - -
Year 1 3455628 -6554042 3455628 0.8333 2879690
Year 2 3977421 -2576621 7433049 0.6944 2762098
Year 3 3959865 1383244 11392914 0.5787 2291589
Year 4 3224747 4607991 14617661 0.4823 1555144
TOTAL 9488521

The Net NPV after 4 years is -521149

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488521 - 10009670 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Panic 1907 to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Panic 1907 has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Panic 1907 can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Panic 1907, then the stock price of the Panic 1907 should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Panic 1907 should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Robert F. Bruner (2018), "The Panic of 1907 and the High Tide of Progressivism (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.