×




Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Taieb Hafsi. The Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible (referred as “Gildan Activewear” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible Case Study


Supplement to case HEC175. In the early 1990s, the company now known as Gildan Activewear was a small children's wear firm with revenues of $40 million. Its competition, legendary companies such as Russell, Fruit of the Loom, and Hanes, had sales in the billions of dollars. From its small beginnings and through unparalleled growth, Gildan went on to dominate most segments of the world's activewear market. This case presents the history of both the company and the industry, with an overview of major competitors. It systematically outlines Gildan's march toward domination, explaining not only how it built its position but also the in-house development of all its functions to strengthen that position. Finally, the case describes the strategic focus of the company as well as the values that motivate its managers. 2010 (Case A) The 2010 Gildan case (A) shows how a single company can influence industry leaders and dynamics and provides a classic example of the importance of the three pillars of strategic management: environment, internal management, and leadership. 2016 (Case B) The 2016 Gildan case (B) describes the situation in 2016. It can be used as a conclusion to the 2010 case for an interesting discussion of the social responsibility of a large company, or as a standalone case.


Case Authors : Taieb Hafsi

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020775) -10020775 - -
Year 1 3452651 -6568124 3452651 0.9434 3257218
Year 2 3981523 -2586601 7434174 0.89 3543541
Year 3 3936679 1350078 11370853 0.8396 3305312
Year 4 3245644 4595722 14616497 0.7921 2570854
TOTAL 14616497 12676925




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656150

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Gildan Activewear shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Gildan Activewear have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Gildan Activewear often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Gildan Activewear needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020775) -10020775 - -
Year 1 3452651 -6568124 3452651 0.8696 3002305
Year 2 3981523 -2586601 7434174 0.7561 3010603
Year 3 3936679 1350078 11370853 0.6575 2588430
Year 4 3245644 4595722 14616497 0.5718 1855707
TOTAL 10457046


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436271

(10457046 - 10020775 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020775) -10020775 - -
Year 1 3452651 -6568124 3452651 0.8333 2877209
Year 2 3981523 -2586601 7434174 0.6944 2764947
Year 3 3936679 1350078 11370853 0.5787 2278171
Year 4 3245644 4595722 14616497 0.4823 1565222
TOTAL 9485548


The Net NPV after 4 years is -535227

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9485548 - 10020775 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Gildan Activewear to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Gildan Activewear has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Gildan Activewear can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Gildan Activewear, then the stock price of the Gildan Activewear should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Gildan Activewear should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible

References & Further Readings

Taieb Hafsi (2018), "Gildan Activewear Inc. (B) - 2016: Profitable and Socially Responsible Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hongbaoli A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Innovation Medical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Hi Gold Ocean SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Ascot SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


EN Shoham SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense