The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Frederic Dalsace, Sandy Jap. The The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship (referred as “Relational Demeanor” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Joint ventures.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship Case Study

Organizational transactions are handled along a continuum of the firm's customer relationships, ranging from relational and friendly to more adversarial and us-versus-them in demeanor. For top customers, the approach is almost always close and relational. In this article, we question this view and suggest that there is benefit from conditioning the firm's relationship development efforts on an understanding of the true value to be gained from partnering and increased closeness. We provide a framework with which managers can diagnose their current portfolio of relationships with key customers or suppliers and offer suggestions for action. We provide an empirical illustration of the typical distribution of responses among five regions of the framework and discuss its implications.

Case Authors : Frederic Dalsace, Sandy Jap

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Joint ventures

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018634)	-10018634	-	-
Year 1	3445197	-6573437	3445197	0.9434	3250186
Year 2	3980231	-2593206	7425428	0.89	3542391
Year 3	3944318	1351112	11369746	0.8396	3311725
Year 4	3243331	4594443	14613077	0.7921	2569022
TOTAL			14613077		12673325

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654691

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Relational Demeanor have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Relational Demeanor shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Relational Demeanor often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Relational Demeanor needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018634)	-10018634	-	-
Year 1	3445197	-6573437	3445197	0.8696	2995823
Year 2	3980231	-2593206	7425428	0.7561	3009626
Year 3	3944318	1351112	11369746	0.6575	2593453
Year 4	3243331	4594443	14613077	0.5718	1854385
TOTAL					10453288

The Net NPV after 4 years is 434654

(10453288 - 10018634 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018634)	-10018634	-	-
Year 1	3445197	-6573437	3445197	0.8333	2870998
Year 2	3980231	-2593206	7425428	0.6944	2764049
Year 3	3944318	1351112	11369746	0.5787	2282591
Year 4	3243331	4594443	14613077	0.4823	1564106
TOTAL					9481745

The Net NPV after 4 years is -536889

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481745 - 10018634 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Relational Demeanor to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Relational Demeanor has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Relational Demeanor can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Relational Demeanor, then the stock price of the Relational Demeanor should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Relational Demeanor should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship

References & Further Readings

Frederic Dalsace, Sandy Jap (2018), "The Friend or Foe Fallacy: Why Your Best Customers May Not Need Your Friendship Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.