×




Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rawi Abdelal, Rafael Di Tella, Prabakar Kothandaraman. The Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version (referred as “Infosys Contextualizes” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Ethics, Globalization, Government, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version Case Study


Shortly after Infosys was founded in 1981, its managers faced a major turning point when they made a decision to operate without giving in to the petty corruption rife in the Indian economy. Within just a few years, that decision had truly defined the company. Over the next 25 years, Infosys managers went to extraordinary lengths to avoid even the most modest of practices that they considered inappropriate. Explores the practices and methods that Infosys adopted instead, considers their costs, benefits, and generalizability, and contextualizes the problem within Indian political and economic institutions that continue to evolve.


Case Authors : Rawi Abdelal, Rafael Di Tella, Prabakar Kothandaraman

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Ethics, Globalization, Government, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013967) -10013967 - -
Year 1 3448616 -6565351 3448616 0.9434 3253411
Year 2 3970454 -2594897 7419070 0.89 3533690
Year 3 3939194 1344297 11358264 0.8396 3307423
Year 4 3228096 4572393 14586360 0.7921 2556954
TOTAL 14586360 12651479




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2637512

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Infosys Contextualizes shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Infosys Contextualizes have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Infosys Contextualizes often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Infosys Contextualizes needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013967) -10013967 - -
Year 1 3448616 -6565351 3448616 0.8696 2998797
Year 2 3970454 -2594897 7419070 0.7561 3002234
Year 3 3939194 1344297 11358264 0.6575 2590084
Year 4 3228096 4572393 14586360 0.5718 1845674
TOTAL 10436789


The Net NPV after 4 years is 422822

(10436789 - 10013967 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013967) -10013967 - -
Year 1 3448616 -6565351 3448616 0.8333 2873847
Year 2 3970454 -2594897 7419070 0.6944 2757260
Year 3 3939194 1344297 11358264 0.5787 2279626
Year 4 3228096 4572393 14586360 0.4823 1556759
TOTAL 9467492


The Net NPV after 4 years is -546475

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9467492 - 10013967 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Infosys Contextualizes to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Infosys Contextualizes has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Infosys Contextualizes can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Infosys Contextualizes, then the stock price of the Infosys Contextualizes should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Infosys Contextualizes should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Rawi Abdelal, Rafael Di Tella, Prabakar Kothandaraman (2018), "Infosys in India: Building a Software Giant in a Corrupt Environment, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Inaba Denki Sangyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Eco World Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Samkwang Glass SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


VINX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Noposion Agro A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Roto-Gro Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Personal Services