Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ali F. Farhoomand, Samuel Tsang. The Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China (referred as “Internet Censorship” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Government, Internet, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China Case Study

In mid-February 2006, Christopher Smith, a U.S. Republican Congressman, proposed the Global Online Freedom Act, draft legislation that would prohibit U.S.-listed Internet companies from complying with the demands of Internet censorship and the requirement to disclose the personal information of Internet users imposed by the People's Republic of China. These U.S.-listed Internet companies include hardware and/or software vendors and search services providers that enable millions of businesses and individuals to operate on the Internet. The bill was introduced following a congressional hearing in Washington, D.C. called in February 2006, after a number of American Internet companies were found to be participating in the repression of human rights in China. Looks at the dilemma facing multinational firms: how to comply with local laws while at the same time trying to be socially responsible.

Case Authors : Ali F. Farhoomand, Samuel Tsang

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Globalization, Government, Internet, Social responsibility

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10020675)	-10020675	-	-
Year 1	3449280	-6571395	3449280	0.9434	3254038
Year 2	3978414	-2592981	7427694	0.89	3540774
Year 3	3971485	1378504	11399179	0.8396	3334535
Year 4	3247368	4625872	14646547	0.7921	2572220
TOTAL			14646547		12701567

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2680892

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Internet Censorship shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Internet Censorship have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Internet Censorship often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Internet Censorship needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10020675)	-10020675	-	-
Year 1	3449280	-6571395	3449280	0.8696	2999374
Year 2	3978414	-2592981	7427694	0.7561	3008253
Year 3	3971485	1378504	11399179	0.6575	2611316
Year 4	3247368	4625872	14646547	0.5718	1856693
TOTAL					10475636

The Net NPV after 4 years is 454961

(10475636 - 10020675 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10020675)	-10020675	-	-
Year 1	3449280	-6571395	3449280	0.8333	2874400
Year 2	3978414	-2592981	7427694	0.6944	2762788
Year 3	3971485	1378504	11399179	0.5787	2298313
Year 4	3247368	4625872	14646547	0.4823	1566053
TOTAL					9501554

The Net NPV after 4 years is -519121

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501554 - 10020675 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Internet Censorship to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Internet Censorship has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Internet Censorship can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Internet Censorship, then the stock price of the Internet Censorship should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Internet Censorship should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China

References & Further Readings

Ali F. Farhoomand, Samuel Tsang (2018), "Global Corporate Social Responsibility Vs. Local Legal Compliance: A Case of Internet Censorship in China Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.