×




Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Tarun Khanna. The Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993 (referred as “Prc Microsoft” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993 Case Study


Explores some of the economic and political tradeoffs that need to be negotiated by a firm seeking to influence industry structure. The setting is the nascent personal computer software industry in the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1993. Microsoft has to localize its software products for use in the PRC. This localization can either be done in-house by Microsoft, or can be contracted to the local software vendors. Explores the costs and benefits of full integration and arm's-length market transaction. Also discusses the "holdup" problem that arises when assets specific to a particular partnership are created.


Case Authors : Tarun Khanna

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Government, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002750) -10002750 - -
Year 1 3465533 -6537217 3465533 0.9434 3269371
Year 2 3970234 -2566983 7435767 0.89 3533494
Year 3 3949749 1382766 11385516 0.8396 3316285
Year 4 3238860 4621626 14624376 0.7921 2565480
TOTAL 14624376 12684631




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681881

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Prc Microsoft have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Prc Microsoft shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Prc Microsoft often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Prc Microsoft needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002750) -10002750 - -
Year 1 3465533 -6537217 3465533 0.8696 3013507
Year 2 3970234 -2566983 7435767 0.7561 3002067
Year 3 3949749 1382766 11385516 0.6575 2597024
Year 4 3238860 4621626 14624376 0.5718 1851829
TOTAL 10464427


The Net NPV after 4 years is 461677

(10464427 - 10002750 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002750) -10002750 - -
Year 1 3465533 -6537217 3465533 0.8333 2887944
Year 2 3970234 -2566983 7435767 0.6944 2757107
Year 3 3949749 1382766 11385516 0.5787 2285734
Year 4 3238860 4621626 14624376 0.4823 1561950
TOTAL 9492736


The Net NPV after 4 years is -510014

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492736 - 10002750 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Prc Microsoft to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Prc Microsoft has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Prc Microsoft can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Prc Microsoft, then the stock price of the Prc Microsoft should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Prc Microsoft should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993

References & Further Readings

Tarun Khanna (2018), "Microsoft in the People's Republic of China--1993 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Xing AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Spartan Motors SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Oneview Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Planet Green SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Health Discovery Cp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Accrelist Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Hardware


Leonardo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Gan Shmuel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Trigiant SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Dai-Ichi Seiko SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


O.R.T. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming