×




Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ripsy Bondia, Ashutosh Dash. The Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma (referred as “Classmate Securenow's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Financial analysis.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma Case Study


In April 2014, the founder of SecureNow met with one of his classmates who was now an angel investor. The two had recently met socially and the founder had briefed his classmate on SecureNow's online business-to-business insurance marketplace. The classmate was now expressing interest in investing in SecureNow but his valuation was much lower than the founder's expectation. The founder was confident of SecureNow's future growth, but he wanted funds to expand. His classmate would provide him with the kind of relationship he was seeking with an investor, but the founder wondered how he and his classmate arrived at such different valuations. He also wondered whether he should accept the funds at a low valuation, consider other options, or just postpone his expansion plans. Ripsy Bondia is affiliated with Management Development Institute. Ashutosh Dash is affiliated with Management Development Institute.


Case Authors : Ripsy Bondia, Ashutosh Dash

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Financial analysis




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013507) -10013507 - -
Year 1 3451211 -6562296 3451211 0.9434 3255859
Year 2 3963009 -2599287 7414220 0.89 3527064
Year 3 3952183 1352896 11366403 0.8396 3318329
Year 4 3233776 4586672 14600179 0.7921 2561453
TOTAL 14600179 12662706




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2649199

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Classmate Securenow's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Classmate Securenow's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Classmate Securenow's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Classmate Securenow's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013507) -10013507 - -
Year 1 3451211 -6562296 3451211 0.8696 3001053
Year 2 3963009 -2599287 7414220 0.7561 2996604
Year 3 3952183 1352896 11366403 0.6575 2598624
Year 4 3233776 4586672 14600179 0.5718 1848922
TOTAL 10445204


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431697

(10445204 - 10013507 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013507) -10013507 - -
Year 1 3451211 -6562296 3451211 0.8333 2876009
Year 2 3963009 -2599287 7414220 0.6944 2752090
Year 3 3952183 1352896 11366403 0.5787 2287143
Year 4 3233776 4586672 14600179 0.4823 1559498
TOTAL 9474740


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538767

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9474740 - 10013507 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Classmate Securenow's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Classmate Securenow's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Classmate Securenow's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Classmate Securenow's, then the stock price of the Classmate Securenow's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Classmate Securenow's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma

References & Further Readings

Ripsy Bondia, Ashutosh Dash (2018), "Price or Relationship: SecureNow's Dilemma Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Gabriel Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Shenergy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


DarioHealth SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Shenzhen Mys A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


KONE Oyj SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Andrew Peller B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Sichuan Sunny Seal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Pazoo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Catalog & Mail Order)


Shang Gong A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


GTX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Safe Bulkers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation