Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gerardo Perez Cavazos, Suraj Srinivasan. The Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B) (referred as “Aes Impairments” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B) Case Study

Supplement to case 118023. As a global energy generating company, AES frequently faces challenges from political changes and instability. This is exacerbated by the fact that in many instances AES' primary customer is the government, which is also in charge of law-making. For example, AES' management team has encountered expropriation risks in Venezuela, collection problems in the Dominican Republic, and regulatory changes in the United States that have led to asset impairments. More recently, the Bulgarian energy regulator announced its intentions to seek a 30% price reduction on a power purchase agreement signed over 10 years ago with AES. Accordingly, AES' management is evaluating whether the renegotiation will lead to any asset impairments and the overall effects on its financial statements.

Case Authors : Gerardo Perez Cavazos, Suraj Srinivasan

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Risk management

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B) Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010923) -10010923 - -
Year 1 3454385 -6556538 3454385 0.9434 3258854
Year 2 3978069 -2578469 7432454 0.89 3540467
Year 3 3975799 1397330 11408253 0.8396 3338158
Year 4 3243108 4640438 14651361 0.7921 2568845
TOTAL 14651361 12706324

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2695401

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Aes Impairments shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Aes Impairments have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Aes Impairments often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Aes Impairments needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010923) -10010923 - -
Year 1 3454385 -6556538 3454385 0.8696 3003813
Year 2 3978069 -2578469 7432454 0.7561 3007992
Year 3 3975799 1397330 11408253 0.6575 2614152
Year 4 3243108 4640438 14651361 0.5718 1854258
TOTAL 10480215

The Net NPV after 4 years is 469292

(10480215 - 10010923 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010923) -10010923 - -
Year 1 3454385 -6556538 3454385 0.8333 2878654
Year 2 3978069 -2578469 7432454 0.6944 2762548
Year 3 3975799 1397330 11408253 0.5787 2300810
Year 4 3243108 4640438 14651361 0.4823 1563999
TOTAL 9506011

The Net NPV after 4 years is -504912

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9506011 - 10010923 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Aes Impairments to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Aes Impairments has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Aes Impairments can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Aes Impairments, then the stock price of the Aes Impairments should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Aes Impairments should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

Negotiation Strategy of Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B)

References & Further Readings

Gerardo Perez Cavazos, Suraj Srinivasan (2018), "Accounting for Political Risk at AES (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Petpal Pet Nutrition SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing

Corvus Gold Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver

Family SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)

Vectron Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals

Pradip Overseas Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.